Biographies can be inspiring, and thought-provoking, and I
have always enjoyed reading them. In general, I have preferred reading about
contemporary figures rather than historical ones as I relate better to the
present than the past. But, a problem with the typical biography is that you
learn about one person in absolute terms, without benchmarks, unless the author
chooses to provide them.
I recently had the opportunity to read three books which, instead
of looking at a single individual, profiled parallel lives. This choice happened
by chance and not by design, but all three were wonderful reading experiences.
An Uncommon Friendship Indeed
An Uncommon Friendship – From Opposite Sides of the
Holocaust by Bernat Rosner and Frederic C. Tubach (with assistance from Sally
Patterson Tubach) is the amazing story of an Auschwitz survivor (Rosner) told
by a German contemporary (Tubach) whose family had strong Nazi sympathies at
that time. After the War, Rosner and Tubach both emigrated to the United States
where they made their own lives – Rosner as a retail executive, and Tubach as a
professor at the University of California. They happened to meet in California many
decades after the War and slowly discover each other’s past.
Rosner spent about a year at Auschwitz where his survival
was nothing short of miraculous. At a critical juncture, he was just one step
away (or one guard’s gesture away) from being assigned to a path to the gas
chamber rather than the line to live another day. Rosner had dealt with the
horrors and nightmares of the holocaust in which he lost his entire immediate
family by suppressing their memories and building his life anew in the land of
opportunity. The last person with whom you would expect him to share his past
was Tubach, given his family’s Nazi background. But An Uncommon Friendship is a
heart-warming tale of how Rosner and Tubach slowly discovered each other to the
extent that they travelled together to Europe to the villages of their
childhood to re-construct and share their past. This tale of human bonding is
such a sharp contrast to the inhuman atrocities that characterized Nazi Germany
that one wonders how such extremes can happen in the same human race.
Rosner got a lucky break after the War when he was able to
emigrate to the United States rather than re-locate to the fledgling state of
Israel thanks to the magnanimity of an American soldier he befriended when the Americans
took control of some of the regions that had been under German occupation. The soldier
turned out to be the scion of a rich American family, and arranged for him to
enroll in college in the US. Rosner grabbed that break with both hands and
built his life afresh.
Troubled Talent
Robert Peace, the protagonist of The Short and Tragic Life
of Robert Peace by Jeff Hobbs got such a break as well, but what happened
thereafter couldn’t have been more different. Peace, an African American, was
born to a hard-working yet penurious woman and an enigmatic, drug-dealing
father (who spent most of his life behind bars for a murder that the book
suggests he may not have committed) in a troubled, crime and drug-plagued
suburb of Newark called East Orange.
Academically brilliant, he went to the
best schools his mother could afford including a top notch Jesuit institution
in Newark city. Impressed by his promise, the school’s most successful alum
sponsored Peace for a university education of his choice. This allowed him to
attend Yale University.
The book is written by Jeff Hobbs, Peace’s (white) roommate,
an aspiring if unsuccessful novelist, and tells the story of Peace’s life with
a particular focus on his years at Yale and what happened thereafter. Peace’s
life is juxtaposed against those of his contemporaries, rich and poor, black
and white. What emerges is a sensitive yet stark sociological portrait of
contemporary America that gives a more nuanced picture of socioeconomic
conditions, race relations, crime and discrimination than what gets from the
typical coverage of the recent killings of black youth by white American
policemen.
As its title suggests, this book doesn’t have a happy end. Peace
is a complex and infuriating character, brilliant but deeply flawed at the same
time. Was his inability to “make it” in the land of opportunity the result of
human frailty or the milieu in which he grew up? Why could Bernat Rosner
overcome his past and build a new life but Robert Peace not do the same? Can
the barriers of race and discrimination ever be overcome? These thoughts will
live with me for a long time to come.
Nehru and Bose
I drew the title of this post from the third book - Nehru
& Bose: Parallel Lives by Rudrangshu Mukherjee. Like all Indians, I knew several
things about both Nehru and Bose before I read this book, and much more about
Nehru than Bose! Nehru, the aristocratic visionary, to whom we owe the concept
of a modern, democratic India but also the ideological barriers that come in
the way of our achieving our economic potential; Bose, the courageous and
impatient nationalist, whose mysterious and sudden disappearance and death
created forever an enigmatic halo.
By re-constructing the lives of Bose and Nehru in the
chronology and context of the freedom struggle, Mukherjee brings out the
similarities and differences between these two outstanding freedom fighters.
Neither was poor, both had socialist leanings, and were
strongly committed to India’s freedom. Both had their differences with Gandhi,
and had trouble in understanding some of the tactical decisions he took in the
course of the freedom struggle. But, they dealt with these in different ways.
Nehru treated Gandhi as a father figure (Gandhi was a great source of emotional
strength to Nehru after Motilal’s early demise) and kept many of his
differences to himself, while Bose was impatient and outspoken. The book
clearly suggests that Gandhi trusted Nehru more than he trusted Bose. There
also seems to have been a fear of Bose’s charisma and his ability to mobilise
and motivate people. To compound matters, Bose had many competitors in Bengal
politics and sometimes needed to take a more extreme position in order to
demonstrate his leadership.
The biggest difference between Nehru and Bose towards the
end was of course their attitude towards the use of force in the final thrust
for freedom. Bose’s fascination for the military and all that goes with it went
back to his youth, and manifested itself in the creation of the Indian National
Army (INA). Bose and his colleagues showed considerable physical courage in
this endeavor and ex-members of the INA became important contributors to the
development of India. But, Bose’s grand dream of teaming up with the Axis
powers was doomed almost from the start – Mukherjee’s book brings out well the
inherent contradictions in Bose trying to work with the Nazi leadership.
Mukherjee has not, as far as I can see, brought out any
startling new facts about Nehru and Bose. But, by re-telling history in the
right sequence and going back and forth between the two protagonists, he shows
clearly that Nehru and Bose had several things in common, including a warm
personal friendship for much of the 1930s. This is book is a wonderful
introduction to the history of the time as well as the two towering persons who
are the subject of this book. Unlike the other two books I wrote about in this
post, this book is focused more on the subjects’ public persona, but I suppose
that’s inevitable since they were public leaders of such importance.
Tailpiece
These three wonderful books illustrate the power of
profiling parallel lives. I hope to find more books in this genre, and perhaps
even write one myself someday!
No comments:
Post a Comment